-
Website
http://www.rickyjordan.com/ -
Original page
http://www.rickyjordan.com/2008/08/solidworks-name-change.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
alexLPD
2 comments · 1 points
-
fcsuper
3 comments · 1 points
-
MatthewWest
5 comments · 2 points
-
maneeshbhati
2 comments · 1 points
-
gol10dr
4 comments · 7 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
SolidWorks Help in your Browser!
1 week ago · 6 comments
-
SolidWorks 2010: Mouse Gestures
3 weeks ago · 2 comments
-
Dassault Systemes in NASCAR
3 weeks ago · 1 comment
-
SolidWorks Help in your Browser!
Interesting comments. There are third party vendor applications that can convert SolidWorks to CATIA and vice versa. If what you are saying is true then these companies would already be BUYING a translator whose cost doesn't even come close to the difference between buying SolidWorks and CATIA, and switch to SolidWorks. So in my opinion that negates your argument. CATIA is still for the most part intended for a different market. My position on this is that a translator between two products owned by the same company should BE INCLUDED with the software.
WHAT IS EVEN MORE INTERESTING IS...... Your IP address links you back to another CAD company who just so happens to compete directly with SolidWorks. I would appreciate it if you would leave the competitive trash talking OFF MY BLOG. Judging from the tactics of your company in the past...I can't say I'm surprised at the origin of this comment.
Ricky Jordan
are the third party translators between CATIA and Solidworks capable of maintaining the part's feature tree? how do they map features which may not be present in one of them?
I haven't looked at the third party stuff in a while. Most of them will convert without features. There were a few of them in the past that would do it with features but they do the conversion for you on a "pay per model" basis.
If you are interested, e-mail me and I'll try to dig up some of the translators I looked at in the past.
Ricky